| |
Paid for by the Republican National Committee.310 First Street, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003(202) 863-8500 - www.GOP.com
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. |
| You are receiving this email because you signed up as a member of the Republican National Committee's online community. If you would prefer to no longer receive emails from the Republican National Committee, pleasevisit our subscription center. |
Reply:
Yes, it is fiscally reasonable to ask college students to pay more for their student loans--but it isn't morally responsible to increase the cost of college, ESPECIALLY when that money isn't going back into the funds for future college students, but into the pockets of private banks.
I have 6 student loans to pay back--ALL of them are through private banks even though they are FEDERAL student loans. I do not believe that it's right for my rate to double simply because I obtained them during a time that Washington cannot get it's [excuse me] together. Republicans, I assume, have been fighting against banks that unfairly raise the rates of responsible homeowners, why not also fight in favor of the responsible college students?
I notice that there is no mention of what this "reasonable, responsible legislation" is--why haven't you enlightened us about it?--or are you afraid that a Democrat will steal it in it's early version and try to pass it off as their own?
***
NOTE: I didn't mention this in my email and I'm not going to bother to add it now, but I think it's hilarious to word it as "skyrocketing student loan debt". It's one thing to fight against the "rising cost of a college education" (principal), but raising the interest rate ONLY raises the amount of debt a student has (principal plus interest). Republicans want to raise revenue in Washington by charging students more--the "skyrocketing student loan debt" they want to tackle is where Washington isn't getting their money back fast enough for their liking (not having enough money available for future students given the current rate of repayment). BUT, they'd actually get their principal back faster if they LOWERED the interest rate. My payments are currently about 65% interest accrued, 35% towards the principal. And I'm thinking that the Feds get a very small percentage of that interest, hence the Republicans interest in the issue (no pun intended).
At least they didn't include their fundraising spiel in this email.
***
NOTE: I didn't mention this in my email and I'm not going to bother to add it now, but I think it's hilarious to word it as "skyrocketing student loan debt". It's one thing to fight against the "rising cost of a college education" (principal), but raising the interest rate ONLY raises the amount of debt a student has (principal plus interest). Republicans want to raise revenue in Washington by charging students more--the "skyrocketing student loan debt" they want to tackle is where Washington isn't getting their money back fast enough for their liking (not having enough money available for future students given the current rate of repayment). BUT, they'd actually get their principal back faster if they LOWERED the interest rate. My payments are currently about 65% interest accrued, 35% towards the principal. And I'm thinking that the Feds get a very small percentage of that interest, hence the Republicans interest in the issue (no pun intended).
At least they didn't include their fundraising spiel in this email.
No comments:
Post a Comment